Liverpool: 0151 224 0500   |   Manchester: 0161 827 4600   |   Email: info@bermans.co.uk   |   Twitter Icon  |  Linkedin Icon
bermans_logo

Employment Law: Are Uber drivers workers?

The Court of Appeal has confirmed this month that Uber drivers are workers rather than self-employed, in Uber v Aslam. The drivers’ contracts described them as independent contractors. They had to undertake an interview and an induction. They had to perform the work personally. Drivers used their own vehicles, but Uber stipulated appropriate brands and presentation standards. In providing jobs, Uber controlled the key information. They would provide drivers with a passenger’s first name but no surname, contact details or destination. Uber had complete control of the fares. Financial penalties could be incurred for departing from Uber’s suggested route.

Continue Reading

Employment Law: Is an employer responsible for the actions of an employee who has ‘gone rogue’?

Is an employer responsible for the actions of an employee who has ‘gone rogue’ and deliberately posted sensitive employee data online? Yes, the Court of Appeal has said in Morrisons v Various Claimants. Mr Skelton was an internal auditor at Morrisons. He had been recently disciplined and held a grudge against the company. He took sensitive personal data relating to thousands of employees and posted it online. He then told newspapers it was there. The data included names, bank details and salary information.

Continue Reading

Family Investment Companies

robin-hastings-1-1Traditionally, the most common way to pass down family wealth has been by way of discretionary trust structures. However, recent changes to the tax regime now mean that family investment companies (FICs) could offer more favourable tax treatments when deciding how to deal with future generations – particularly for individuals with large inheritance tax (IHT) estates.

Continue Reading

Employment Law: Post TUPE variation of contract

Mr Tabberer and his colleagues were electricians. They were originally employed by Birmingham City Council. Their employment transferred several times by way of TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006) over the years. At the time of the tribunal claims, they were employed by Mears. The employees were contractually entitled to receive an Electricians’ Travel Time Allowance, though the historical reasons for the allowance no longer existed. Mears varied the employees’ contracts to remove the allowance, saying it was outdated.

Continue Reading

Debt recovery: Range of fixed fees

Charges from 1st July 2022

 

Stage 1 – Pre litigation: Letter Before Action

Debtor is an individual: Protocol Claim £30.00+VAT
Debtor is a Limited Company or Partnership (LLP): Non-Protocol Claim £25.00+VAT

This includes taking instructions, preparing and issuing letter by 1st Class post.

The debtor will be advised to send any payments and communication to you directly.

Should you require us to enter into discussion or correspond with the debtor this would be carried out at a standard additional fixed fee of £30.00+VAT per item.

A fee of £10.00+VAT is chargeable for transferring each debtor payment received by us to you.

 

Stage 2 – Issue of Claim

stage2

*Both the Court fee and part of Bermans fee (as shown in brackets) are recoverable if successful

Should the debtor file a defence then this will be referred to one of our lawyers who will advise you accordingly.  Any work carried out at this point will be chargeable at an hourly rate, as detailed later in this document.

 

Stage 3 – Obtain Judgment

stage3

*Part of Bermans fee (as shown in brackets) is recoverable if successful

The £ value range given above is dependent on the type of Judgment being requested:

  • In default of Acknowledgement of Service
  • In default of Defence
  • On Admission and acceptance of offer
  • On Admission and rejection of offer

 

Stage 4 – Enforcement

Writ of Control (enforcement via HCEO)

stage4

*Both the Court fee and part of Bermans fee (as shown in brackets) are recoverable if successful

Should enforcement be unsuccessful the HCEO will charge an abortive fee of £75.00+VAT.

Costings for other forms of Enforcement are available on request (as below):

  • Attachment of Earnings
  • Charging Order
  • Statutory Demand (based on a money Judgment)
  • Bankruptcy Petition
  • Winding up Petition

Contact:

crdlpool@bermans.co.uk

 

 

Continue Reading

The impact of Brexit on contracts

As Brexit draws near, the question of how it will affect business and the need to know your contractual rights is ever more important.

Some questions you may ask yourself:

  • What happens if the borders are clogged up and I cannot deliver or receive goods
  • Who will be liable for tariffs in the event of a hard Brexit
  • Should I look at amending existing contracts or terminating contracts with a view to issuing new contracts
  • Will you have to register with a UK authority in place of an EU one?
Continue Reading

Bills of Sale escape extinction

The Government recently announced that it does not intend to legislate to implement the September 2016 Law Commission proposals to modernise the archaic Bills of Sale regime:

“Given the concerns that were raised in the consultation, the small and reducing market and the wider work on high-cost credit, the government will not introduce legislation at this point in time. The government will continue to work with the FCA as they carry out their high-cost credit review, and then further consider government action on alternatives to high-cost credit in light of the FCA’s review”.

Continue Reading